Realism vs. antirealism is a debate that many skeptics debate upon on various topics that are involved to metaphysics, it is important that person assess the different aspects and views of the topic with utmost care to avoid misunderstanding the situation and harnessing the most energy. Many aspects including political, religious and tradition play a major part on influencing realism and antirealism in metaphysics and how different people view it.
Metaphysics requires a combination of both, where by the person following metaphysics beliefs must be able to assess both situations and choose whichever he finds the most suitable for him. Realism requires one to consider the factual aspects of metaphysics where research has been done to determine evidence that may support claims in to different topics. Antirealism on the contrary believes or being one sided with no regard to the other arguments that may be available on the topic. Metaphysics believers must be able to assess both situations equally and harness the positive energy from both sides to be able to actively harness metaphysics power to the human body.
What is realism?
Realism is the acceptance of phenomenon that may not be physically proven by science but at the same time have not been proven to the false by science, making them neutral. Phenomenon such as black holes is yet to be proven but evidence points towards the phenomenon being true even though there may be no physical evidence.
The same can be explained for metaphysics powered that could be delivered from jewels of terrestrial bodies that may affect once life. there is reason to believe the gravitational pull may affects ones mood or fate but there is no physical proof that id actually does making it a stall mate or neutral for both sides.
Antirealism:
Antirealism is the situation when a person will contradict or oppose a situation whether there is evidence of not. In this situation the person blocks out any possibility of even assessing a possibility besides his own. Antirealists can also be found on both the scientific side as when as the metaphysical believer where the person will not consider assessing the situation from a different angle.
Scientific skeptics will not consider metaphysical powers do to the lack of physical evidence where as metaphysical power believers will not stop believing on powers that may have been proven not to affect the human body.
To be able to harness metaphysics powers o must be able to assess the situation neutrally yet maintain full confidence in his belief, without this neutral assessment the core of metaphysical energy is lost and one finds himself drifting towards negative territory that may not support either of the augments. Having a cool mind and maintaining concentration of your objective would be the best way of maintain or harnessing metaphysical energy that energy believer intends to do.
Realism vs. antirealism is a major factor that requires to be dealt with carefully by a person in order to achieve ones goals in life without losing out while standing on the hedge confused on which side to be jump to.